Just to put my two cents into this little discussion.

First off, props to Caffiend for posting these reviews! They were well written!

I've played AA2, and I have to say that the biggest draw for me is just customizing the girls. I have to agree with Nautica that there was too much RPG and not enough pure interaction...too hard to get the girl to the point of actually wanting to be with you, and too much risk of losing it after that. Just my personal preference ..

I love RPG games, such as skyrim, etc....but AA2's core gameplay felt more like a grindfest...

I've never played Girlvania, nor it's predecessor, so I can't comment on that.

I do like 3Dsexvilla, to a point...again, the customiztion is amazing...though the voices of the girls and the horribly cheesy dialog gets to me ...

lol yeah i too hated the voices in 3dsexvilla. I ALWAYS use the ball gag because it's the only way to shut them up. Its like the Devs just skimmed through one porno and cut out a few phrases and sex sounds without normalizing any of it. The girls didn't really "react" to your actions as much as i would have liked. It's more interactive then most, But no where Near XSP. The customization is decent. I really enjoyed the facial features and body sliders. I spent most of the time making models in that game. although they were limited when compared to poser or daz studio, Adding that much control over that much of the girls looks without modding the game. It was a giant leap forward for the sex simulator genre and i give it it's due credit. But i want to have as much fun fucking the girls as i do making them.