xmoonproductions.org https://xmoonproductions.org/ |
|
Perhaps it's for the best we don't have actual hands ingame. https://xmoonproductions.org/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=253 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Pickled Cow [ Sat Apr 27, 2013 7:39 am ] |
Post subject: | Perhaps it's for the best we don't have actual hands ingame. |
Case in point. |
Author: | xpadmin [ Sat Apr 27, 2013 9:51 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Perhaps it's for the best we don't have actual hands ing |
Lol, I agree |
Author: | xebat [ Sat Apr 27, 2013 12:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Perhaps it's for the best we don't have actual hands ing |
But , we need stuff like fingering and grabbing breasts. And also if there will be Oculus Rift implmentation the Razer Hydra which you would use with it , would need hands. Please at least just try. |
Author: | xpadmin [ Sat Apr 27, 2013 12:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Perhaps it's for the best we don't have actual hands ing |
@xebat Yes I agree. |
Author: | weipai [ Mon Apr 29, 2013 9:21 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Perhaps it's for the best we don't have actual hands ing |
I thought the hand in Sexy Beach Zero was almost perfect, the dev should take a look at that game. It should just be a floating hand that you can turn on or off, I remember Illusion tried adding an arm in Real Girlfriend but it was a complete failure. |
Author: | xpadmin [ Mon Apr 29, 2013 9:25 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Perhaps it's for the best we don't have actual hands ing |
Yes I think a complete arm would be to restricting. For both the arm to look good and not be restricted at the same time, is almost impossible. But a hand with some arm attached that fades away until it becomes invisible would be a good balance I think. |
Author: | user101 [ Mon Apr 29, 2013 3:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Perhaps it's for the best we don't have actual hands ing |
xpadmin wrote: But a hand with some arm attached that fades away until it becomes invisible would be a good balance I think. Sounds to me like a pretty good solution, it both mitigates the distraction of a hovering hand, and it wont create a physical "decoration'" to get in your way. ^^ |
Author: | Tobz [ Wed May 01, 2013 10:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Perhaps it's for the best we don't have actual hands ing |
I think a hand of any sort would be great somewhere down the road. Not as primitive as Sexy Beach's, but it doesn't have to be as intricate as the surgery simulator's. |
Author: | StevenS_ [ Wed May 15, 2013 6:37 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Perhaps it's for the best we don't have actual hands ing |
Hands wouldn't be bad....neither would being able to use your mouth and tongue at some point. ![]() |
Author: | Mdritch [ Fri May 24, 2013 8:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Perhaps it's for the best we don't have actual hands ing |
Pickled Cow wrote: BAHAHAHA!! Oh god, I couldn't breathe during that... "Why the fuck are you wearing your watch during surgery!?!" hahahaha Ahem. In all seriousness, I totally think it would be for the best if we *at least* had actual hands in-game. ~nodnods~ Just...something with a simpler control scheme than Surgeon Simulator, hahahaha |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |